La radio à l’ère de la convergence
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet ouvrage porte principalement sur l'éthique de la communication et sur la volonté de ses artisans de la rendre libre et accessible. Derrière les divergences de vue que comportent les différents engagements politiques et institutionnels, et au-delà des technologies émergentes, se profile l'idée-force que la radio reste toujours le média exemplaire, accessible au plus grand nombre.Plus maniable, plus présente que le réseau électronique, dont à l'occasion elle s'inspire, mais sur lequel elle jette aussi un regard critique, la radio est un instrument idéal de démocratie et un véhicule efficace de pénétration culturelle. Les participants au colloque organisé par Radio-Canada, dont ce livre est la synthèse, se sont efforcés de poser un regard neuf sur le rôle de la radio, non sans parfois lui adresser quelques reproches. Les propos échangés reflètent l'inquiétude ressentie face à la mondialisation et, en même temps, la conviction que l'avenir est ouvert sur la liberté de parole et d'intervention.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.026 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.016 | 0.010 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.030 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".