MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W283588073 · doi:10.3138/jcs.36.3.61

Do Parents have Fundamental Rights?

2001· article· en· W283588073 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
R. Brian Howe

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Canadian Studies · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMulticultural Socio-Legal Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFundamental rightsRatificationRight to propertyInternational human rights lawLawPolitical scienceLinguistic rightsHuman rightsConventionConvention on the Rights of the ChildEconomic JusticeLaw and economicsSociologyPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article addresses the question of whether parents have fundamental rights in relations with their children. Against the claim that parents have fundamental rights, and in reference to the evolution of Canadian public policy and Canada’s ratification of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, it is argued that it is children — not parents — who have basic rights. In so far as parents have rights, they are conditional rights — not fundamental rights — and are connected to their obligations to provide for the rights and best interests of their children. Such an understanding is justified in reference not only to the Convention but also to John Rawls’s theory of justice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.027
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.982
Threshold uncertainty score0.039

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.027
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.009
Scholarly communication0.0030.009
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.085
GPT teacher head0.362
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Canadian StudiesSame topicMulticultural Socio-Legal StudiesFrench-language works237,207