Effect of Overaging on the Cyclic Deformation Behavior of an AA6061 Aluminum Alloy
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The present work encompasses the effect of overaging on the strain-controlled low-cycle fatigue (LCF) behavior of an extruded AA6061 aluminum alloy at varying strain amplitudes. During the T7 aging treatment, the size of precipitates increased from 60 nm under T6 conditions to 220 nm after aging for 48 h at 200 °C, leading to a decrease in the monotonic tensile strength. During the LCF tests, nearly symmetrical hysteresis loops can be observed in the mid-life cycle under all test conditions, whereas the first-cycle hysteresis loops were moderately inflected under long-aging conditions. With increasing aging time, the cyclic peak stresses decreased and the plastic strain increased. Nearly ideal Masing behavior was exhibited under T6 conditions, while it was lost under T7 overaging conditions. The cyclic stress responses were similar under all tested conditions, involving stabilization at low strain amplitudes and softening at high strain amplitudes, with initial hardening for the first few cycles. Compared to the T6 condition, the fatigue life increased with increasing T7 aging time. Various LCF parameters were estimated based on the Coffin-Manson and Basquin relationships and on the LCF experimental results. The relationship between the fatigue life, strength, and microstructure of the investigated AA6061 aluminum alloy under various aging conditions was discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it