MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2839487559 · doi:10.2147/ndt.s165618

Gender differences in the protective effects of green tea against amnestic mild cognitive impairment in the elderly Han population

2018· article· en· W2839487559 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Hua Xu, Yaping Wang, Yefeng Yuan, Xulai Zhang, Xiaoyun Zuo, Lijuan Cui, Ying Liu, Wei Chen, Ning Su, Haihong Wang, Yan Feng, Xia Li, Tao Wang, Shifu Xiao

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTea Polyphenols and Effects
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSchool of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong UniversityShanghai Jiao Tong UniversityChinese Academy of Sciences
KeywordsMedicineCognitionLogistic regressionMontreal Cognitive AssessmentCognitive impairmentDemographyGreen teaPopulationGerontologyEnvironmental healthTraditional medicineInternal medicinePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Gender differences may contribute to variances in the potential protective effects of tea against cognitive impairment in the elderly. Objective: To examine the association between different types of tea consumption and the risk of amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) along gender lines. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted with reference to 20 communities in China. The sample population included elderly participants aged 60 years or older. A standardized questionnaire was used to collect each participant’s general demographic information. Trained psychologists administrated the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) to assess participants’ cognitive function. An attending psychiatrist evaluated each participant’s cognitive function. Finally, data from 2,131 participants were analyzed to assess the association. Results: With regard to male participants, the percentage of green tea consumption was higher in the normal control group than in the aMCI group ( Χ 2 =4.64, P =0.031). Logistic regression analysis showed that green tea consumption reduced the risk of aMCI in male participants (OR=0.657, P =0.019), and this finding was highly significant in males aged under 70 years (OR=0.376, P =0.002). Regarding female participants across every age group, the results indicated that tea consumption failed to significantly decrease the risk of aMCI ( P >0.05). Unlike green tea, black tea and oolong tea were not correlated with a reduced risk of aMCI in terms of gender or age group. Multiple linear regression analysis also revealed that age, years of education, and green tea consumption ( B =0.996, P =0.000) were associated with MoCA and MMSE scores, though only in male participants. Conclusion: Green tea consumption showed a protective effect against aMCI in males but not in females, particularly in males aged <70 years. However, black tea and oolong tea failed to show any protective effect in either males or females. Keywords: gender difference, green tea, amnestic mild cognitive impairment, protective factor

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.053
Threshold uncertainty score0.357

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuropsychiatric Disease and TreatmentSame topicTea Polyphenols and EffectsFrench-language works237,207