MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2841941342 · doi:10.1504/ijmic.2018.10014595

Model-based sliding functions design for sliding mode robot control

2018· article· en· W2841941342 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Modelling Identification and Control · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic and Pneumatic Systems
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSliding mode controlControl theory (sociology)RobotMode (computer interface)Computer scienceControl engineeringControl (management)EngineeringArtificial intelligencePhysicsNonlinear systemHuman–computer interaction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper introduces a novel manifold design for sliding mode control, applicable to second-order mechanical systems in which nonlinear dynamics can be formalised into that of robotic manipulators. The new approach shows that model-based sliding manifold design substantially simplifies the torque control law, which ultimately becomes linear in terms of joint angles and rates. Additionally, this approach allows the decoupling of the chattering effect on the torque inputs on each axis. A new property related to the gravity term is introduced and is used for stability analysis and model validation. Simulation results compare the introduced approach to the conventional linear manifold design and demonstrate that the new approach reduces transient constraints on torque input and is more robust to matched uncertainties for low inertia robots.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.984
Threshold uncertainty score0.519

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it