Perfis motivacionais de corredores de rua com diferentes tempos de prática
Bibliographic record
Abstract
O objetivo desta pesquisa é testar se existem diferenças no perfil motivacional de dois grupos de corredores de rua, com diferentes tempos de prática: grupo Adesão (até um ano de prática) e grupo Permanência (mais que um ano de prática). Para tanto, 62 praticantes de ambos os sexos e com idades entre 18 e 68 anos responderam ao Inventário de Motivos para a Prática Regular de Atividades Físicas ou Esportivas (IMPRAFE-132). Os resultados indicam que as dimensões mais motivadoras são as mesmas (Saúde, Prazer e Controle de Estresse), independente do tempo de prática, respeitando a mesma ordem. A conclusão principal é que essas são as dimensões que melhor representam os motivos de adesão e permanência à corrida de rua. As dimensões Sociabilidade e Competitividade são significativamente mais importantes para o grupo Permanência.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".