Transition from shear band propagation to global slab failure in submarine landslides
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The risk posed by seabed instability is of increasing significance as offshore activities including oil and gas developments continue to expand in this century. Many studies have considered runout of debris flows resulting from submarine landslides and potential impact on offshore infrastructure. However, initiation of slab failure resulting from shear band propagation (SBP) at the onset of a landslide has received less attention, although it is of key importance for estimating the scale and consequences of landslides. The present paper explores arrest of SBP as well as global slab failure above the shear band. The complete evolution of a submarine landslide from shear band initiation, propagation, slab failure, and arrest of SBP is observed through large-deformation finite element (LDFE) modelling. Governing equations for both dynamic and quasi-static SBP are established and solved, with results showing good agreement with the LDFE results. Lower limits for the final shear band length and for global slab failure are proposed for cases with high strain-rate dependency of shear strength, where shear band propagation is quasi-static; upper limits are proposed for cases without rate effects where the behaviour is dynamic.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".