Phylogenetic relationships among the Rangeomorpha: the importance of outgroup selection and implications for their diversification
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Rangeomorpha are the oldest, most diverse, and most disparate clade of Ediacaran macrofossils. Easily identifiable by their self-similar branching pattern, they occupied epibenthic niche space ranging from the lowest-tiered and recumbent taxa up to metre-long upright fronds. A phylogenetic analysis using the largest and most complete character set known for this group scored for 14 separate taxa was undertaken to resolve their internal relationships and test previous hypotheses of their evolutionary and ecological history. Owing to the lack of consensus on the relationship amongst Ediacaran clades, several permutations with different potential outgroup taxa were performed. Across these analyses, there is a strong signal for an upright frondose ancestral state for this clade, likely displaying primary branches that were double-sided, nonrotated, with the lower-tiered and recumbent forms being derived members of a single subclade. This has implications on the life history reconstruction as well as taxonomic implications for this clade and the origins of large multicellular life in the late Ediacaran.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".