Alternative Educational System Sudbury Valley as a Model for Reforming School
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
General trends of innovations in Russian system of education are connected with the ideas of humanism, the priority of developing the child's personality, creative collaboration of teachers and students as equal subjects. In addition, the Russian school officials have nowadays possibilities to implement the variability of curricula, to open author schools. The existing experience of different countries in creation of multi-choice alternative schools, their successful activities and international recognition becomes a real basis for the development of Russian school and pedagogy. These points actualize the research of alternative education systems. The article is devoted to the historical development, and the experience of the alternative educational system Sudbury Valley School, founded in 1968 in Framingham Massachusetts USA. Alternative educational movement Sudbury Valley includes about 40 schools in the United States, Belgium, Japan, the Netherlands, Denmark, Germany, Israel and others. We consider this educational system a positive model for reforming school in Russia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it