MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2853603805 · doi:10.1111/ajt.15015

Effects of everolimus and HLA-G on cellular proliferation and neutrophil adhesion in an in vitro model of cardiac allograft vasculopathy

2018· article· en· W2853603805 on OpenAlexaff
A.G. Mociornita, M. Adamson, Laura C. Tumiati, Heather J. Ross, Vivek Rao, Diego Delgado

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Transplantation · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicReproductive System and Pregnancy
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEverolimusMedicineDownregulation and upregulationWestern blotHeart transplantationCell adhesionEndothelial stem cellImmunologyHuman leukocyte antigenTransplantationPharmacologyCellInternal medicineIn vitroBiologyAntigenBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Human leukocyte antigen-G (HLA-G) expression is modulated by immunosuppressant use and is associated with lower incidence of graft rejection and cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV). We examined whether everolimus induces HLA-G expression and inhibits human coronary artery smooth muscle cell (HCASMC) proliferation, a critical event in CAV. Also, we examined whether TNFα-stimulated neutrophil adhesion is inhibited by HLA-G on human coronary artery endothelial cells (HCAECs). HLA-G expression in HCASMCs following everolimus treatment was determined by western-blot densitometric analysis. HCASMCs proliferation following incubation with recombinant HLA-G was determined by automated cell counter detecting 2-10 µm particles. Assessment of recombinant HLA-G on neutrophil adhesion to HCAECs in response to TNF-α induced-injury was determined by nonstatic adhesion assays. HLA-G expression was upregulated in HCASMCs following everolimus exposure (1000 ng/ml; P < .05). HLA-G (500, 1000 ng/ml; both P < .05) reduced HCASMC proliferation and inhibited TNFα-stimulated neutrophil adhesion to endothelial cells at all concentrations (0.1-1 ng/ml; all P < .001). Our study reveals novel regulation of HLA-G by everolimus, by demonstrating HLA-G upregulation and subsequent inhibition of HCASMC proliferation. HLA-G is a potent inhibitor of neutrophil adhesion to HCAECs. Findings support HLA-G’s importance and potential use in heart transplantation for preventative therapy or as a marker to identify patients at high risk for developing CAV. Human leukocyte antigen-G (HLA-G) expression is modulated by immunosuppressant use and is associated with lower incidence of graft rejection and cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV). We examined whether everolimus induces HLA-G expression and inhibits human coronary artery smooth muscle cell (HCASMC) proliferation, a critical event in CAV. Also, we examined whether TNFα-stimulated neutrophil adhesion is inhibited by HLA-G on human coronary artery endothelial cells (HCAECs). HLA-G expression in HCASMCs following everolimus treatment was determined by western-blot densitometric analysis. HCASMCs proliferation following incubation with recombinant HLA-G was determined by automated cell counter detecting 2-10 µm particles. Assessment of recombinant HLA-G on neutrophil adhesion to HCAECs in response to TNF-α induced-injury was determined by nonstatic adhesion assays. HLA-G expression was upregulated in HCASMCs following everolimus exposure (1000 ng/ml; P < .05). HLA-G (500, 1000 ng/ml; both P < .05) reduced HCASMC proliferation and inhibited TNFα-stimulated neutrophil adhesion to endothelial cells at all concentrations (0.1-1 ng/ml; all P < .001). Our study reveals novel regulation of HLA-G by everolimus, by demonstrating HLA-G upregulation and subsequent inhibition of HCASMC proliferation. HLA-G is a potent inhibitor of neutrophil adhesion to HCAECs. Findings support HLA-G’s importance and potential use in heart transplantation for preventative therapy or as a marker to identify patients at high risk for developing CAV.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.155
Threshold uncertainty score0.289

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of TransplantationSame topicReproductive System and PregnancyFrench-language works237,207