Relative Movement: Investigating the Entanglement of Women's Physical and Political Emancipation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This joint research project stems from our seminar "Contemporary Germany through Media and News". 2018 marks 100 years since women gained the right to vote in Germany and Austria and 47 years post-suffrage in Switzerland. To celebrate and assess this milestone, our course is focusing on women's suffrage now and then.
 What does universal suffrage mean now, in a Germany with a female Chancellor and a Parliament containing a right-wing party; in a Europe that is regionalizing; in a world in which governments are in deficit while the richest avoid taxation and finance their chosen interests?
 What did the vote mean then, during the heat of the struggles; when activists risked lives for more self-determination; when societies were organized around working-class women's double burdens and bourgeois women's matrimonial hearths?
 Our materials of study include the following: two feature films that frame the period, Asta Nielsen's die Suffragette (1913), a perhaps ironic love story about the voting struggle in Germany, and Petra Volpe's die göttliche Ordnung (2017), a tale of a small Swiss town's decision for universal suffrage. These films are augmented by contemporary essays by women active in today's public landscape in Europe and texts that thematize women and movement.
 We are each writing on aspects of women's physical and political mobility and aim to publish in the Anthology on Social Justice and Intersectional Feminism. By presenting at Inquiry@Queen's we hope both to share results and improve our work ahead of submission to this peer-reviewed e-journal in early April 2018.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.013 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".