In Situ Permeability and Scale Dependence of an Active Accretionary Prism Determined From Cross‐Borehole Experiments
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Permeability controls fluid flow in the Earth's crust and affects a wide range of processes including advective transport and pore pressure generation. However, in situ measurements of permeability are few, especially in active tectonic settings or at scales relevant to regional flow. We analyze formation fluid pressure records from oceanic boreholes in the Nankai accretionary prism offshore southwest Japan, focusing on unexpected responses to drilling operations conducted at boreholes ~100 m to the northeast. We develop a 2‐D numerical model of transient fluid flow and conduct a parametric grid search to define hydraulic diffusivity. A value of 0.19–0.46 m2/s (corresponding to a permeability of 9.8 × 10−13 to 2.4 × 10−12 m2) yields the best fit to observed pressure responses. Together with laboratory measurements on core samples and drillstrem tests reported in previous studies, our analysis indicates a strong scale dependence of permeability, likely reflecting the presence of permeable faults and fractures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".