MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Re-examining the Travel of Ideas: Of Editing, Generativity & Temporality

2018· article· en· W2855229674 on OpenAlexaffabout
Joel Bothello, Daniel Waeger, Tim Weiss, Klaus Weber

Bibliographic record

VenueAcademy of Management Proceedings · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicICT Impact and Policies
Canadian institutionsWilfrid Laurier University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTemporalityGenerativitySociologyTransparency (behavior)ImmediacyPoliticsNegotiationPraxisMedia studiesPolitical scienceSocial scienceEpistemologyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Management research has demonstrated a striking interest in diffusion research over the past decades. Our conceptual understanding of how diffusion happens has been greatly altered from deterministic to probabilistic models as well as from realist to phenomenological perspectives by drawing on an eclectic theoretical toolkit. It is time to revisit these theoretical advancements vis-à-vis contemporary socio-political and economic developments and charter new territory. This symposium brings together a range of perspectives from scholars studying diffusion across a variety of seemingly unconventional contexts (including the transformation of yoga into a market, the importation of technology entrepreneurship ideals into Kenya, the establishment of active ownership in Switzerland after an earlier failure at importing the idea and the semiotic negotiations of transparency in the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative). Taken together, these papers wrestle with the dynamic nature of diffusion processes and shed new light on the role that editing, generativity and temporality play when ideas, concepts and innovations “get from here to there.” From Patañjali to the Gospel of Sweat: Yogas Transformation into a Multi-Billion Dollar Market Presenter: Kamal A Munir; U. of Cambridge Presenter: Shahzad Ansari; Cambridge U. Presenter: Deborah Brown; U. of Cambridge Globalization in Action: Templates and Strategies of Action in Kenyan ICT Entrepreneurship Presenter: Tim Weiss; Stanford U. Presenter: Klaus Weber; Northwestern U. Legacy Effects of Social Movements: Activists in Abeyance and the Diffusion of Active Ownership Presenter: Daniel Waeger; Wilfrid Laurier U. Presenter: Sébastien Mena; Cass Business School, City, U. of London Negotiating and Editing Transparency in a Multi-Stakeholder Initiative Presenter: Lisa Baudot; U. of Central Florida Presenter: Joel Bothello; John Molson School of Business, Concordia U. Presenter: David Cooper; U. of Alberta

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.022
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.056
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.114

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0220.056
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.004
Science and technology studies0.0110.071
Scholarly communication0.0250.041
Open science0.0020.012
Research integrity0.0030.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAcademy of Management Proceedings→Same topicICT Impact and Policies→French-language works237,207→