MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2856725472 · doi:10.1109/jiot.2018.2853708

End-to-End Delay Modeling for Embedded VNF Chains in 5G Core Networks

2018· article· en· W2856725472 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Internet of Things Journal · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5G
Canadian institutionsHuawei Technologies (Canada)University of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceTransmission delayProcessing delayComputer networkQueueing theoryEnd-to-end delayNetwork packetNode (physics)Packet processingQueuing delayNetwork delayLayered queueing networkTransmission (telecommunications)Distributed computingTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, an analytical end-to-end (E2E) packet delay modeling is established for multiple traffic flows traversing an embedded virtual network function (VNF) chain in fifth generation communication networks. The dominant-resource generalized processing sharing is employed to allocate both computing and transmission resources among flows at each network function virtualization (NFV) node to achieve dominant-resource fair allocation and high resource utilization. A tandem queueing model is developed to characterize packets of multiple flows passing through an NFV node and its outgoing transmission link. For analysis tractability, we decouple packet processing (and transmission) of different flows in the modeling and determine average packet processing and transmission rates of each flow as approximated service rates. An M/D/1 queueing model is developed to calculate packet delay for each flow at the first NFV node. Based on the analysis of packet interarrival time at the subsequent NFV node, we adopt an M/D/1 queueing model as an approximation to evaluate the average packet delay for each flow at each subsequent NFV node. The queueing model is proved to achieve more accurate delay evaluation than that using a G/D/1 queueing model. Packet transmission delay on each embedded virtual link between consecutive NFV nodes is also derived for E2E delay calculation. Extensive simulation results demonstrate the accuracy of our proposed E2E packet delay modeling, upon which delay-aware VNF chain embedding can be achieved.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.773
Threshold uncertainty score0.779

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it