MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Análisis de la gestión del turismo de la comunidad de Oñacapac del cantón Saraguro de la provincia de Loja

2013· dissertation· en· W28592073 on OpenAlex
Mayra Alexandra Matute Farfán, Jaime Roberto Poma Sigcho

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueZhonghua wai ke za zhi [Chinese journal of surgery] · 2013
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicOrganizational Management and Innovation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<b>Objective:</b> To evaluate the influence of patellofemoral joint degeneration and pre-operative pain location on the outcome of medial Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). <b>Methods:</b> A total of 58 patients (58 knees) with medial Oxford UKA had been performed for medial osteoarthritis from March 2013 to July 2014 in Department of Orthopaedic Surgery at First Teaching Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University were retrospective reviewed. There were 24 males and 34 females, the age from 43 to 87 years with the mean age was 68.5 years. The mean body mass index was 25.2 kg/m(2) ranging from 19.7 to 31.5 kg/m(2). Patients were divided into anterior-medial pain group (35 knees), anterior knee pain group (17 knees) and general knee pain group (6 knees) according to pre-operative pain location. Pre-operative radiological statuses of the patellefemoral joint were defined by Ahlback system and divided into patellofemoral joint degeneration group (16 knees) and normal group (42 knees). Patients were also divided into medial patellofemoral degeneration group (20 knees), lateral patellofemoral degeneration group (12 knees) and normal group (26 knees) according to Altman scoring system. Outerbridge system was used intraoperatively and the patients were divided into patellofemoral joint degeneration group (21 knees) and normal group (37 knees). Pre- and post-operative outcomes were evaluated with Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Western Ontario and MacMaster (WOMAC) and patellofemoral score system of Lonner. <i>T</i> test and ANOVA were used to analyze the data. <b>Results:</b> The average duration of follow-up was 33 months (from 26 to 42 months). There were no patients had complications of infection, deep vein thrombosis, dislocation or loosing at the last follow-up. Compared to pre-operation, OKS (18.9±3.5 <i>vs</i>. 38.9±4.7, 19.3±4.2 <i>vs</i>. 39.6±4.6, 18.1±3.2 <i>vs</i>. 38.1±3.7)(<i>t</i>=5.64 to 7.08, all <i>P</i><0.01) and WOMAC (10.9±2.3 <i>vs</i>.53.2±4.5, 10.4±2.1 <i>vs</i>.54.6±3.4, 11.7±1.8 <i>vs</i>.52.8±3.7)(<i>t</i>=14.50 to 19.16, all <i>P</i><0.01) decreased, and the Lonner score (88.9±3.4 <i>vs</i>.38.6±2.8, 87.5±4.1 <i>vs</i>.38.2±2.3, 88.2±3.2 <i>vs</i>. 37.6±3.5)(<i>t</i>=-19.78 to -18.16, all <i>P</i><0.01) increased significantly in anterior-medial pain group, anterior knee pain group and general knee pain group. According to Ahlback scoring system, compared to pre-operation, OKS (18.3±2.4 <i>vs</i>. 38.7±4.4, 19.6±1.8 <i>vs</i>. 38.4±3.1)(<i>t</i>=7.05, 9.08, both <i>P</i><0.01) and WOMAC (10.6 ±2.6 <i>vs</i>.53.2±4.5, 12.1±1.4 <i>vs</i>.52.4±3.3)(<i>t</i>=14.21, 19.52, both <i>P</i><0.01) decreased, the Lonner score (88.1±3.1 <i>vs</i>.38.3±3.3, 86.9±2.6 <i>vs</i>.39.1±2.4)(<i>t</i>=-18.90, -23.40, both <i>P</i><0.01) increased significantly in patellofemoral joint degeneration group and normal group, the outcomes were the same according to Altman and Outerbridge scoring system. There was no significant difference between patellofemoral joint degeneration group and normal group based on Ahlback grading system. According to Altman classification, compared to normal group, there was no statistically differences in OKS, WOMAC and Lonner scoring system between patients with degeneration in the medial patellofemoral joint group, OKS and WOMAC increased (20.2±1.4 <i>vs</i>.18.2±2.7, 12.5±1.7 <i>vs</i>.10.5±2.5) (<i>t</i>=-4.30, <i>P</i>=0.03; <i>t</i>=-4.80, <i>P</i>=0.02), the Lonner score decreased (84.3±2.8 <i>vs</i>.87.4±3.2) (<i>t</i>=-6.20, <i>P</i>=0.01) in lateral patellofemoral degeneration group. According to Outerbridge scoring system, there were no statistically differences in patients in patellofemoral joint degeneration group and normal group. <b>Conclusions:</b> There is a good evidence that neither mild to moderate degree of patellofemoral joint degeneration nor pre-operative pain location will compromise the short-term outcome of medial Oxford UKA, and should not be considered as contraindications. The situation is less clear for lateral patellofemoral degeneration, and more cautious option is advised.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.105
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it