Поздняков Д. О. Критерії класифікації світового ринку космічних технологій та послуг
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Scientific approaches to formation and classification of the space technologies and services markets are considered in this article. The topic is highly essential during transition of the national economy of Ukraine to the innovative way of development which facilitates efficient implementation of the potential accumulated by the rocket-space industry and promotion of the space products to the world market. The rocket-space industry takes considerable place in the government policy of Ukraine determining its status as a country of high technologies in the world market. World space industry of the leading countries such as the USA, Russia, France, Germany, Japan and Canada becomes more profitable and in 2012 its income amounted to $100 bln USD. However, participants of the space technologies market are facing competition, protectionism and other specific peculiarities of the science-intensive product markets. In connection with the aforesaid, the world space technologies (ST) market represents significant scientific-technological and commercial interests for the rocket-space industry of Ukraine. Criterion of accessibility of the world space technologies markets is index of competitiveness of 13 world leading (key) space countries. Criteria of the space technologies regional markets formation are proximity of scientific, technical-technological levels of countries development of a separate region. Regional division of the world market allows developers and users of space technologies to determine most optimal location of the subsidiaries, branches, representative offices with the purpose of maximum coverage of a certain segment of the regional market. Special attention is paid to development of markets of concentrated space technologies exchange (CSTEM). Criteria were formed that compose the basis of strategic partnership in the field of scientific-research and technological projects development. The article identifies criteria of space products world markets classification, establishes their interconnection, provides characteristics of each market type and identifies degree of the Ukrainian rocket-space industry integration into the system of the world trade
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it