MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2861037318 · doi:10.1117/12.2312491

METIS AO RTC concept

2018· article· en· W2861037318 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Martin Kulas, Thomas Bertram, Florian Briegel

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdaptive optics and wavefront sensing
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceWavefront sensorSpectrographXeonSIMDWavefrontMetisAdaptive opticsParallel computingPhysicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

METIS is the Mid-infrared E-ELT Imager and Spectrograph, one of three first generation instruments of the European Extremly Large Telescope (E-ELT). The primary mirror of the E-ELT has a diameter of 39 meter. This huge aperture requires an adaptive optics system in order to provide the performance close to the diffraction limit that is needed for all scientific observing modes of METIS. METIS will be be equipped with a single conjugated adaptive optics (SCAO) system that makes use of a near-infrared wavefront sensor. A real-time computer (RTC) reconstructs the wavefront and sends correction commands to the deformable mirror M4 and the field stabilization mirror M5. The METIS SCAO team evaluates computer workstations with the many-core processor Intel® Xeon Phi™ Knights Landing (KNL) for the real-time computation within the wavefront control loop. This processor is a promising candidate to satisfy the METIS AO needs as it allows for massively parallel computations. This parallelization is achieved by utilizing up to 272 logical CPUs, the new SIMD (single instruction, multiple data) instruction set AVX-512 and the high-bandwidth on-CPU memory MCDRAM. This paper describes the SCAO RTC concept, evaluates the computational performance that a wavefront control loop could have when using a Xeon Phi KNL, and compares it to the identified requirements. The measurements will be conducted with the AO system software of the LINC-NIRVANA project under Linux. Especially, the real-time capability is analyzed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.912
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdaptive optics and wavefront sensingFrench-language works237,207