A NEW SPECIES OF HYMENORUS (COLEOPTERA: ALLECULIDAE) FROM CALIFORNIA
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hymenorus rufohumeralis, a new species from California, is described, illustrated, and compared with other species of the genus. A distinctive new species of the genus Hymenorus was found in two recent shipments of Alleculidae sent to me for identification. I thank Mr. James Wappes and Mr. W. H. Tyson for making this material available and allowing me to describe the species. Species of the genus Hymenorus are widely distributed throughout North America from the southern portions of the boreal forest south through Mexico and Central America to the northern coast of South America. The greatest diversity of species is found in the arid regions of the southwestern United States and Mexico. Fall (1931) revised the 100 species of the genus known from the United States and Canada. Hatch (1965) added two additional species from the Pacific Northwest. The keys provided by Casey (1891) and Arnett (1968) are adequate to distinguish the species of Hymenorus from those of other genera of the family. The methods and terminology used in this paper were described in detail in previous papers on the systematics of the family Alleculidae, especially in my revision of the genus Lobopoda (Campbell 1966).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.080 | 0.011 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it