Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hymenorus rufohumeralis, a new species from California, is described, illustrated, and compared with other species of the genus. A distinctive new species of the genus Hymenorus was found in two recent shipments of Alleculidae sent to me for identification. I thank Mr. James Wappes and Mr. W. H. Tyson for making this material available and allowing me to describe the species. Species of the genus Hymenorus are widely distributed throughout North America from the southern portions of the boreal forest south through Mexico and Central America to the northern coast of South America. The greatest diversity of species is found in the arid regions of the southwestern United States and Mexico. Fall (1931) revised the 100 species of the genus known from the United States and Canada. Hatch (1965) added two additional species from the Pacific Northwest. The keys provided by Casey (1891) and Arnett (1968) are adequate to distinguish the species of Hymenorus from those of other genera of the family. The methods and terminology used in this paper were described in detail in previous papers on the systematics of the family Alleculidae, especially in my revision of the genus Lobopoda (Campbell 1966).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".