MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Intuition in Organizations: Research and Practice

2018· article· en· W2863392807 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAcademy of Management Proceedings · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicCompetitive and Knowledge Intelligence
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntuitionEpistemologyPsychologyKnowledge managementSociologyCognitive scienceComputer sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The goal of this symposium is to address the call from last year which highlighted the interest in the application of intuition research in practical settings, particularly in, but not limited to, the organizational context. The theme ‘Intuition: Research and Practice’ emerged as a natural progression of this line of thinking and serves as another important step in consolidating knowledge in the discipline, making it more accessible to decision makers as individuals and in organizations. Each of the presentations explores the construct of intuition in a different setting and reports findings from an empirical study. Woiceshyn illustrates with a case study of a CEO’s decision making what implications his integrated intuiting and reasoning approach had in his organization. Akinci and Sadler-Smith explore the role that creative intuitions play in exceptional innovations by focusing on the early stages and the front-end of the invention and innovation process. Wang and Li study intuition in team-level aerospace innovation based on the Chinese traditional philosophical notion of 'Wuity'. Dörfler and Stierand examine the concept of ‘indwelling’ through studying intuitions of Nobel laureates and top chefs. Meziani investigates how film workers make sense of their intuitions on the set, in situ and in a collective context, in order to communicate them to others. Finally, Bas and Sinclair introduce the concept of intuitive wayfinding to a group of analytical thinkers in an IT company to assist in integrating intuition into their skillset. Intuiting and reasoning: Managing subconscious and conscious processing for better decisions Presenter: Jaana Woiceshyn; U. of Calgary The role of intuition in exceptional innovations Presenter: Cinla Akinci; U. of St Andrews Presenter: Eugene Sadler-Smith; U. of Surrey Wuity as higher cognition combining intuition and deliberation for creativity Presenter: Xin (Rachel) Wang; Rachel Presenter: Peter Ping Li; U. of nottingham ningbo china Understanding indwelling through studying intuitions of Nobel laureates and top chefs Presenter: Viktor Dorfler; U. of Strathclyde Presenter: Marc B. Stierand; Ecole Hoteliere de Lausanne Sensing, making, showing: When the body enacts intuition - Insights from film workers on the set Presenter: Nora Meziani; HEC Montreal Introducing analytical thinkers to intuitive wayfinding Presenter: Alina Bas; Alina Bas Consulting Presenter: Marta Sinclair; Griffith U.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.787
Threshold uncertainty score0.377

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.363
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it