MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2865093358 · doi:10.1093/jscr/rjy163

Case series of two falciform ligament incisional hernias and their laparoscopic repair

2018· article· en· W2865093358 on OpenAlex
Olivia Griffin, Yagan Pillay

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Surgical Case Reports · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHernia repair and management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineFalciform ligamentSurgeryIncisional herniaLaparoscopyFibrous jointHerniaLigamentGeneral surgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Incisional hernias involving the falciform ligament have only been reported in two case reports in the English literature. This is the first reported case series of two falciform ligament incisional hernias. Both patients had undergone a prior cholecystectomy. Laparoscopic transabdominal pre-peritoneal repair was performed with an uneventful recovery in both patients. In the previously published reports both patients underwent an open herniorrhaphy with an underlay mesh repair. These are the first two documented laparoscopic repairs of a falciform ligament incisional hernia. The laparoscopic repair also included intra-corporeal suturing of the hernia necks with a non-absorbable suture. We extrapolated this data from the component separation technique which reconstituted the abdominal musculature in their normal anatomical position resulting in a reduced hernia recurrence rate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.072
Threshold uncertainty score0.403

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it