MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W286521411

Presenze Femminili Nella Letteratura Russa

2003· article· it· W286521411 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Anna Makolkin

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Slavonic Papers · 2003
Typearticle
Languageit
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEastern European Communism and Reforms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRussian literatureLiteratureMemoirPoetryHistoryPeriod (music)Cultural historyLiterary criticismNarrativeRussian cultureArtArt historyAesthetics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Emilia Magnanini, ed. Presenze femminili nella letteratura russa (=Eurasiatica 57: Quadernidel Dipartitnentodi Studi Eurasiaticidel UniversitA degli Studi Ca' Foscari di Venezia). Padova: CZEUP, 2000. vii, 192 pp. Paper.Eurasiatica has again pleasantly surprised Western readers with this very enlightening volume dedicated to a sorely neglected topic in Russian literary and cultural history, namely nineteenth and twentieth-century women's writing.Nineteenth-century Russian literature has successfully inscribed itself into the European heroic cultural pantheon as an equal cultural partner, despite the absence of the Russian equivalents of Jane Austen, George Eliot, the Bronte sisters or Mrs. Gaskell. Nevertheless, Russian women writers did exist. They have left for posterity imaginative poetry, elegant short prose, sophisticated essays on various topics, and voluminous commentaries on history, culture, philosophy and music in the form of diaries, letters, autobiographical and biographical writing, and standard memoirs, most of which has been either unjustly marginalized or lost in the historical narrative. This collection of twelve well-researched essays (7 in Italian and 5 in Russian), carefully and thoughtfully selected by Emilia Magnanini, herself also a contributor, will help to correct this historical omission. The volume not only contributes substantially to the now popular area of women's studies, but to Russian literary criticism and to European cultural and literary history. Thanks to the typology and approach adopted by Magnanini, one is simultaneously exposed to the evolution of feminist writing and to the entire Russian literary and cultural panorama over the expanded period of nearly three centuries, covering the Russian Imperial/tsarist, Soviet and post-Soviet literary and cultural phases.This exciting journey into the unknown begins with a most enlightening and well-researched essay by Christiana Cipollini, Una revista al femminile: il 'Damskii Zurnal (pp. 1-24), which addresses the conditions for Russian women writers even as far back as the twelfth to fourteenth centuries, sketching the rise of female intellectuals in Russia, underthe inspiration of the influential cultural policies of Catherine the Great, and finally depicting the history of the now obscure feminist literary journal Damskii Zhurnal Ladies Journal). The story of this journal captures ten important years (1823-33), during which it had the moral support of such notables as Karamzin, Chaadaev, Makarov and Saltykov, all ardent proponents of female emancipation, in spite of the patronizing attitudes of Pushkin and Baratynskii. She includes interesting new facts about the famous Princess Zinaida Volkonskaiia (1789, Dresden-1862, Rome), one of the most prominent contributors to the journal, whom Pushkin immortalized in his poem Tsygane (The Gypsies). Among the less known contributors were Princess Sachovskaiia, Baroness Sofia Ivanovskaiia, Lizaveta Perovskaiia, Zoya Alekseeva, Mariia Lisitsyna, Nadezhda Teplova, Ol'ga Kriukova, Liubov' Krisevskaiia, Anna Volkova, Anna Bunina, and Elizaveta Kul'man. The essay returns their names to Russian literary history, thereby refreshing Russian collective cultural memory.Johanna Spendel's essay L'India di Elena Petrovna Blavatskaiia (pp. 183-92) honors the memory of a somewhat eccentric but very original Russian religious thinker, psychologist and writer, known to intellectual history as Madame the founder of the renowned Theosophical Society who was destined to become the leader of the Theosophical movement in the USA and Canada. Elena Blavatsky (1831, Ekaterinoslav-1891, London) was a daughter of the well-known Russian writer Elena Gan who published under the pseudonym Zenaida R-va. Blavatsky, prior to her emigration from Russia, regularly contributed to various publications in Moscow, Tbilisi and Odessa. Her spiritual search took her to India, Egypt, Tunis, Tibet, Nepal and Palestine, and led to the compilation ofher famous doctrine, which she later transformed into Theosophy. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.064

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Slavonic PapersSame topicEastern European Communism and ReformsFrench-language works237,207