MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W286596347

Race-based Discrimination in Bomb Girls

2015· article· en· W286596347 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Carmela Patrias

Bibliographic record

VenueLabour / Le Travail · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLatin American and Latino Studies
Canadian institutionsBrock University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVictoryAppealPrejudice (legal term)AdversaryPerspective (graphical)Subject (documents)Gender studiesRace (biology)RacismSociologyPolitical scienceMedia studiesHistoryLawPoliticsArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fans of the television series the Bomb Girls believe that one of its great strengths is the historical perspective it provides on the lives of Canadian working women on the home front during World War II. In their protests against the show’s cancellation, some fans note in particular the show’s willingness to tackle “provocative” themes such as racial and sexual discrimination.1 One of my goals here is to explain that despite its wide popular appeal, from the perspective of academic historians, the show obscures more than it reveals about the experiences of racialized minority group members in wartime Canada. My second goal is to suggest why, as professional historians, we should publicize the discrepancy between the popular views conveyed by the show and the conclusions of scholarly reconstructions of the fate of minority workers in wartime. The main representative of groups subject to racist prejudice and discrimination in Bomb Girls is Marco Moretti, an Italian Canadian worker at Victory Munitions, the show’s fictitious bomb factory. Marco, we are told, was two years old when his family immigrated to Canada. He identifies himself as a Canadian. Nevertheless, others, including many of his co-workers, view him with suspicion, as a “foreigner,” an Italian with loyalties to fascist Italy that jeopardize Canadian security. Marco’s father is interned in Petawawa, according to Marco, for no other reason than that he is Italian. It makes good cinematic sense to use a worker with origins in an enemy territory to represent the hardships experienced by so-called foreign workers in Canada during the war. The fate of enemy aliens, especially those among them who were unjustly interned during the two world wars, is the most dramatic manifestation of the difficulties that minority group members experienced in wartime. Canadian audiences, moreover, are likely to respond to the incarceration of Italians during World War II because by now most have some familiarity with wartime internment in Canada. The popular media have paid considerable attention to this subject thanks to lobbying for apology and redress for Japanese, Ukrainian, and Italian Canadians interned during the two world wars. This focus on fears of the threat that “enemy aliens” posed to Canada’s war effort, however, distorts the reality of the wartime experience of minority group members. In contrast to Japanese-Canadians, only a small fraction of “enemy aliens” of European origin were interned. The most pervasive form of discrimination against those of eastern and southern European origin was employment discrimination. As far as immigrants from eastern and southern

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.412
Threshold uncertainty score0.992

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLabour / Le TravailSame topicLatin American and Latino StudiesFrench-language works237,207