Altered branched chain amino acid metabolism
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (CVD) and type II diabetes (T2D) share common etiologic pathways that may long precede the development of clinically evident disease. Early identification of risk markers could support efforts to individualize risk prediction and improve the efficacy of primary prevention, as well as uncover novel therapeutic targets. RECENT FINDINGS: Altered metabolism of branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs), and their subsequent accumulation in circulation, may precede the development of insulin resistance and clinically manifest cardiometabolic diseases. BCAAs - the essential amino acids leucine, isoleucine and valine - likely promote insulin resistance through activation of mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1. Epidemiologic studies demonstrate robust associations between BCAAs and incident T2D, and Mendelian randomization supports a potentially causal relationship. More recently, there is emerging evidence that BCAAs are also associated with incident atherosclerotic CVD, possibly mediated by the development of T2D. SUMMARY: In this article, we review the biochemistry of BCAAs, their potential contribution to cardiometabolic risk, the available evidence from molecular epidemiologic studies to date, and, finally, consider future research and clinical directions. Overall, BCAAs represent a promising emerging target for risk stratification and possible intervention, to support efforts to mitigate the burden of cardiometabolic disease in the population.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".