MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2870050732 · doi:10.1109/jetcas.2018.2852705

An Energy-Efficient Online-Learning Stochastic Computational Deep Belief Network

2018· article· en· W2870050732 on OpenAlexafffund
Yidong Liu, Yanzhi Wang, Fabrizio Lombardi, Jie Han

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Journal on Emerging and Selected Topics in Circuits and Systems · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicError Correcting Code Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceDeep belief networkDeep learningArtificial intelligenceComputationArtificial neural networkFloating pointStochastic gradient descentComputer engineeringMachine learningAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Deep neural networks (DNNs) are effective machine learning models to solve a large class of recognition problems, including the classification of nonlinearly separable patterns. The training of DNNs is, however, particularly difficult due to the large size and high energy consumption of the networks. Recently, stochastic computation (SC) has been considered to implement DNNs to reduce the hardware cost. However, it requires a large number of random number generators (RNGs) and long stochastic sequences that lower the energy efficiency of the network. To overcome these limitations, we propose the design of an energy-efficient deep belief network (DBN) with online learning capacity based on stochastic computation. In the SC-DBN, a reconfigurable structure is utilized to implement the fast greedy learning algorithm and an adaptive moment estimation (ADAM) circuit is designed to improve the speed of the training process. An approximate SC activation unit (A-SCAU) is further designed to implement different types of activation functions in the neurons. The A-SCAU is immune to signal correlations, so the RNGs can be shared among all neurons in the same layer with no accuracy loss. The area and energy of the proposed design are less than 5.5% and 3.7% (or 29.3% and 33.3%) of a pipelined 32-bit floating-point (or an 8-bit fixed-point) implementation. The proposed SC-DBN design achieves a higher classification accuracy compared with the fixed-point implementation. The accuracy is in a range of 0.12% to 0.37% lower than the floating-point design with a significantly lower (or slightly higher) energy consumption than the pipelined (or non-pipelined) circuit for both online learning and inference processes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Journal on Emerging and Selected Topics in Circuits and SystemsSame topicError Correcting Code TechniquesFrench-language works237,207