A paper-based wall-climbing robot enabled by electrostatic adhesion
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we report a paper-based wall-climbing robot capable of climbing vertical walls of different materials. The robot, made from paper and shape memory alloy (SMA), can be controlled to climb walls under certain combinations of activation patterns of electrostatic adhesion and contraction of the SMA. Electrostatic adhesion is applied using a paper structure with embedded interdigitated electrodes. This structure, fully compatible with the paper-based robot, is able to output strong and reliable adhesion forces (the resultant friction force can be as high as 1.65 N on specific substrates), and can be easily turned on and off using a commercial high-voltage converter. The SMA embedded in the robot is employed to deform the robot body and induce contracting displacements while being activated. The elastic energy stored in the robot body allows it to complete a repeatable actuation cycle by recovering the SMA automatically after its contraction. With above structures, we demonstrate the walking and climbing ability of this robot with a locomotion speed of 1 mm/s. The climbing of a vertical wall along both the vertical and horizontal directions is achieved.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".