MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2874578800 · doi:10.1553/joeb67s1

Die Atik Mustafa Paşa Camii und weitere Kirchen zwischen Zeugma und Blachernen

2018· article· de· W2874578800 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Arne Effenberger

Bibliographic record

VenueJahrbuch der Österreichischen Byzantinistik · 2018
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicByzantine Studies and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)SiegeByzantine architectureArtAncient historyPilgrimTheologyHistoryClassicsArchaeologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Atik Mustafa Paşa Camii is the only former Byzantine church in the Blachernai Quarter, which still exists. It owes its survival to its transformation into a mosque. Archaeological evidence suggests that it was erected in the second half of the 9th century. This building was surely not the Church of the Prophet Elijah in the Petrion, because this sanctuary was located much farther southeast between Zeugma and Cibalikapı. Topographical and historical arguments speak for the identification of the Atik Mustafa Paşa with the Church of St. Nicholas of Myra. In its place the church of the holy martyrs Priscus, Martinus and Nicholas, which was constructed by Justinian I, once stood. This church was burnt down during the Avar siege in 626 and renewed at an unknown time—perhaps by one of the first two Macedonian emperors. However, the written sources do not testify to the erection of a Church of St. Nicholas either for Basil I or Leon IV. The generally accepted but unfounded localization of the church within Leon Walls near the Gate of Blachernai must be rejected. The last known visitor to the Church of St. Nicholas in the Blachernai Quarter was the Russian pilgrim Stephen of Novgorod (1348/49).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.073
Threshold uncertainty score0.145

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJahrbuch der Österreichischen ByzantinistikSame topicByzantine Studies and HistoryFrench-language works237,207