MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2874851820 · doi:10.1109/iccw.2018.8403791

Implementation of a Smart Grid Communication System Compliant with IEEE 2030.5

2018· article· en· W2874851820 on OpenAlexaff
Marwan Ghalib, Arslan Ahmed, Ismael Al-Shiab, Zied Bouida, Mohamed Ibnkahla

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSmart Grid Energy Management
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSmart gridTransformerEnergy consumptionComputer scienceGridEmbedded systemReliability engineeringElectrical engineeringEngineeringVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Energy utilities are constantly under pressure to meet the growing and complicated energy demands. The traditional energy grid allows for one-way communication of energy usage between customers and the utilities. This does not allow the utilities to have control or to suggest any changes in consumption based on the energy data they obtain. In this paper, we propose and implement an innovative two-way communication system between the transformer agent (TA), attached to a neighborhood's electric transformer, and its customer agents (CAs), that are attached to each house using inexpensive and common-use devices and modules. In this context, different houses communicate their energy usage, while an electric transformer relays action requests from the energy utility's headquarters. This enables the real-time tracking of energy usage by both the consumers and the utility. Therefore, the efficiency of energy generation and distribution is enhanced, and consumers are empowered to make smarter decisions about their consumption. In our system, Raspberry Pi3 modules are used to represent CAs, while an Intel Edison is used to represent the TAs. CAs form a self- healing mesh network using the high data rate Wi-Fi in mesh mode while TAs communicate with the utility headquarters using LTE. The proposed system is compliant with the IEEE 2030.5 smart energy profile 2.0 requirements and several tests were performed in real neighborhoods and across the Carleton University campus to prove the system's operation and reliability. This paper is a part of a bigger project to achieve a complete and IoT-compatible platform for future smart grids that includes the whole cycle starting from the Home Energy Management System (HEMS) and ending with data analytics and power consumption prediction in the utility headquarter.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.388
Threshold uncertainty score0.296

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSmart Grid Energy ManagementFrench-language works237,207