MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W28749357 · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2016.2609441

Asphalt Rejuvenation for Preservation Focused Agencies

2014· article· en· W28749357 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAsphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsRejuvenationAsphaltBusinessMedicineHistoryGerontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Support vector machine (SVM) is one of the most widely used learning algorithms for classification problems. Although SVM has good performance in practical applications, it has high algorithmic complexity as the size of training samples is large. In this paper, we introduce SVM classification (SVMC) algorithm based on -times Markov sampling and present the numerical studies on the learning performance of SVMC with -times Markov sampling for benchmark data sets. The experimental results show that the SVMC algorithm with -times Markov sampling not only have smaller misclassification rates, less time of sampling and training, but also the obtained classifier is more sparse compared with the classical SVMC and the previously known SVMC algorithm based on Markov sampling. We also give some discussions on the performance of SVMC with -times Markov sampling for the case of unbalanced training samples and large-scale training samples.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.865
Threshold uncertainty score0.559

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it