MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W287610695 · doi:10.4000/rfp.3940

ERLICH Valérie. Les mobilités étudiantes

2012· article· fr· W287610695 on OpenAlexaff
Magali Ballatore

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue française de pédagogie · 2012
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation, sociology, and vocational training
Canadian institutionsHistorical Studies in Education
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesErasmus+PhilosophyArtArt history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le programme de mobilité européen Erasmus a eu 25 ans en 2012 et a suscité de nombreuses publications, aussi bien savantes que profanes. L’ouvrage de synthèse de Valérie Erlich intitulé Les mobilités étudiantes arrive donc à point nommé. Il permet de rappeler que la mobilité étudiante se conjugue au pluriel et qu’elle ne peut être assimilée à un seul type particulier de mobilité, que l’on peut qualifier d’« organisé » ou d’institutionnalisé. Cet état des savoirs, en trois parties, qui reprend...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.088

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.006
Scholarly communication0.0090.006
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0260.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.347
GPT teacher head0.469
Teacher spread0.122 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue française de pédagogieSame topicEducation, sociology, and vocational trainingFrench-language works237,207