MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Social Capital Model of Cross-Cultural Knowledge Transfer

2018· article· en· W2877547333 on OpenAlexaff
Yu‐Shan Hsu, Yu‐Ping Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueAcademy of Management Proceedings · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicKnowledge Management and Sharing
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExpatriateSocial capitalCommunication sourceKnowledge transferPerceptionSample (material)Cultural intelligenceSocial psychologyPsychologyCultural capitalKnowledge managementSociologyComputer sciencePolitical scienceSocial scienceTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of this study is to explicate the transfer of knowledge between expatriates and HCNs by considering how both individuals influence each other’s knowledge acquisition. Drawing on social capital theory and based on a sample of 107 expatriate-HCN dyads, we found that the extent to which the receiver acquires knowledge depends on the sender's perceptions of the social capital that they have. These perceptions are influenced by the receiver's personal qualities (i.e. cultural intelligence) and perceived collaborative-based HR configuration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.685
Threshold uncertainty score0.674

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.387
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAcademy of Management ProceedingsSame topicKnowledge Management and SharingFrench-language works237,207