Bibliographic record
Abstract
A l’heure de la globalisation, ce memento se propose de presenter les systemes juridiques et les branches du droit qui ont le plus d’importance pour lesechanges economiques internationaux et les relations internationales. D’ou le choix des pays etudies :• dans la famille des droits romanistes :– en Europe : l’Allemagne, l’Italie, l’Espagne, les Pays-Bas et la Suisse– dans le monde : le Bresil, la Russie, la Chine et le Japon• dans la famille de droits de common law :– en Europe : l’Angleterre– dans le monde : les Etats-Unis, le Canada et l’Inde D’ou le choix des matieres etudiees :– les fondements : l’histoire, les sources du droit, la constitution, l’organisation judiciaire– les bases du droit prive : les biens, les contrats et la responsabilite– les bases du droit public : les droits de l’homme, les rapports avec l’administration Ce memento s’adresse aux etudiants de licence et de master, ainsi qu’a tous ceux qui souhaitent avoir une vue synthetique des differents droits d’Europe etdu monde.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.058 | 0.017 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".