MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2880131701 · doi:10.1117/12.2311504

A digital beamformer for the advanced focal array demonstrator (AFAD)

2018· article· en· W2880131701 on OpenAlexaff
Stephen A. Harrison, Gary Hovey, Zoran Ljusic, B. Veidt, Tom Burgess

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicRadio Astronomy Observations and Technology
Canadian institutionsDominion Astrophysical Observatory
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceBandwidth (computing)BeamformingChipElectronic engineeringPhased arrayComputer hardwareAntenna (radio)Electrical engineeringEngineeringTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Phased array feeds (PAFs) are an active research area in radio astronomy, as they offer potential advantages over traditional single-pixel feeds. Their key advantage is increased field of view and survey speed, however they also permit tailoring the antenna beam for <i>A<sub>e</sub>=T<sub>sys</sub></i>, or other objectives such as attenuating strong radio frequency interference (RFI). A primary research goal is to improve the noise temperature performance of a PAF over comparable single-pixel feeds. In this work we have constructed a small 16-element digital beamformer with 384 MHz of bandwidth to evaluate the performance of NRCs Advanced Focal Array Demonstrator (AFAD) operating from 750 to 1500 MHz. We compare measured sensitivity results to previous measurements made with an analog beamformer. The digital beamformer is implemented using NRCs Kermode platform, a Virtex6-based compute blade. We take a standards-based approach, using the AdvancedTCA (ATCA) form factor for the Kermode board, ANSI/VITA-49.0 framing for all chip-to-chip and chip-to-host communications, and AXI4-Stream format for all internal datapaths. The Kermode system can be expanded with a standard ATCA full-mesh backplane to support up to 128 inputs with over 1 GHz of bandwidth. This expanded capability will ultimately be used to evaluate the performance of the full 96-element AFAD PAF mounted on a re ector antenna. To achieve this goal, we are well into developing a digitizer system that will handle at least 96 elements with up to 1.5 GHz of bandwidth per element. We present an overview of the digitizer system in the context of the PAF beamformer system, and provide an update on the progress to date.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.961
Threshold uncertainty score0.384

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRadio Astronomy Observations and TechnologyFrench-language works237,207