MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2882975389 · doi:10.1520/jte20160496

The Rock-Breaking Mechanism of Directional Fracture Blast Using an Irregular Shape Cartridge and Its Field Application

2018· article· en· W2882975389 on OpenAlexaff
Yanbing Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Testing and Evaluation · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicHigh-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior
Canadian institutionsGeomechanica (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDetonationCartridgeMaterials scienceFracture mechanicsExplosive materialWedge (geometry)Fracture (geology)Rock blastingFracture toughnessCrack growth resistance curveCompression (physics)Structural engineeringComposite materialCrack closureGeologyGeotechnical engineeringEngineeringOpticsPhysicsMetallurgyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The testing system of digital laser dynamic caustics was performed here to examine the super-dynamic fracture mechanics of directional blasting crack, which, using an irregular shape cartridge, revealed the rock breaking mechanism of directional fracture blast. The findings show that the blasting primary crack fracture features—the typical tensile break, the variation trend of the dynamic stress intensity factor (DSIF), crack propagation velocity, and crack length— were more or less the same, the primary crack fracture was finished during 60–200 μs, the limit DSIF scarcely exceeded 1.5 MN/m3/2, and the arrest toughness of the blasting fracture was about 0.3 MN/m3/2. The irregular shape cartridge showed significant detonation wave unloading effects and detonation gas jet effects in the accumulative direction or slotting direction; the “air wedge effect” of the high-pressure detonation gas jet acted as the main drive for further expansion of the compression radial crack in the accumulative direction (or slotting direction), which also held the propagation of the compression radial crack in the nonaccumulative or nonslotting direction). Additionally, the accumulative cartridge and slotted cartridge were applied to the construction field, and it was found that the directional fracture blast was enabled, the good blasting fracture surface was formed, and better economic benefits and less operation time could be achieved using these two cartridges.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.161
Threshold uncertainty score0.246

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Testing and EvaluationSame topicHigh-Velocity Impact and Material BehaviorFrench-language works237,207