Challenges and Opportunities of Higher Education for International Mining Engineers in China: Based on the Practice at Chongqing University
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Under the background of mineral industry transforms towards global and sustainable development as well as the establishment of innovative country in China, higher requirements for the mineral engineering education have been putting forward. Based on the research on the demands of mining engineers in the domestic and foreign, the mining engineering education objective, which includes the characteristics of international, innovative and interdisciplinary (referred as ‘3I’), was determined. To achieve the ‘3I’ education objective, the international outlook, the economics and management knowledge, as well as the practical ability for knowledge using were enhanced in the new curriculum. Substantially, a new education system includes three sub-education models was generated. Practical outcomes show that the education system is effective on improving the overall quality of students, especially the innovative ability. In the end, the flaws in learning and teaching in the current education system were discussed, including students’ concerns on the global level and understanding different cultures should be strengthened, as well as the teaching contents and teaching philosophy have to satisfy the changes and the demands of the industry development.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".