MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2882988756 · doi:10.4000/1895.5368

Les appareils cinématographiques Lumière

2017· article· fr· W2882988756 on OpenAlexaff
Laurent Mannoni

Bibliographic record

Venue1895 · 2017
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsInstitut d'Histoire de l'Amérique FrançaiseMusée de la Civilisation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Malgré la littérature abondante publiée sur Auguste et Louis Lumière depuis le début du xxe siècle, aucune étude sérieuse n'a été consacrée jusqu'ici aux appareils cinématographiques produits par les deux frères. En attendant un travail plus étendu qui pourra permettre, on l'espère, d'éclaircir encore bien des mystères, cet inventaire chronologique des machines cinématographiques Lumière recense ici les prototypes et appareils fabriqués en série, avec leurs principales caractéristiques. Des deux premiers prototypes d'« appareil servant à l'obtention et à la vision des épreuves chronophotographiques » datant de fin 1894 et début 1895 au Cinématographe-type de décembre 1895, jusqu'aux appareils afférents comme la tireuse, le défileur Carpentier-Lumière, le Kinora, la caméra 50 mm puis 75 mm et aux appareils proposant le relief qui sont mis au point jusqu'au milieu des années 1930 mais ne seront jamais exploités.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.121

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0360.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue1895Same topicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural AnalysisFrench-language works237,207