Postcolonial Ogres: the Grotesque in Ngũgĩ wa Thiong’o’s Wizard of the Crow
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ngũgĩ wa Thiong’o’s Wizard of the Crow dramatises the social decay in much of postcolonial Africa in such a manner that it appears caricatural and rather grotesque. The novel, in fact, teems with grotesque imagery. This paper will analyse Ngugi’s usage of the grotesque aesthetic, with a view to examining the various representations of the grotesque and the extent to which the text is unarguably grotesque. Drawing on M.M. Bakhtin’s concept of the grotesque and of a few other theorists, the paper concludes that Ngugi employs the grotesque as a narrative strategy to illuminate the dehumanising socio-political conditions symptomatic of despotic African nations. By using this strategy, Ngugi equally critiques the monstrosity of unbridled power amongst politicians in government, while advocating its subversion by popular revolution.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".