MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2883057959 · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/aad5d2

Evidence of vegetation greening at alpine treeline ecotones: three decades of Landsat spectral trends informed by lidar-derived vertical structure

2018· article· en· W2883057959 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Douglas K. Bolton, Nicholas C. Coops, Txomin Hermosilla, Michael A. Wulder, Joanne C. White

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental Research Letters · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicRemote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources CanadaCanadian Forest ServiceUniversity of British Columbia
FundersCanadian Space AgencyWestern Canada Research Grid
KeywordsEcotoneVegetation (pathology)ShrubEnvironmental scienceEnhanced vegetation indexPhysical geographyTransectNormalized Difference Vegetation IndexRemote sensingEcologyClimate changeGeographyVegetation IndexBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Monitoring changes in vegetation at high-latitude and alpine treeline ecotones is critical for characterizing changes to carbon and energy budgets, plant species richness, and habitat suitability and is often considered a bellwether of a changing climate. Herein, we used transects of airborne laser scanning (ALS) data to identify alpine treeline ecotones in the Yukon Territory of Canada, and assessed changes in vegetation greenness using a time-series of Landsat imagery over a 30 year period from 1985 to 2015. Specifically, we calculated the enhanced vegetation index (EVI) from annual Landsat composites and assessed temporal trends within 500 m of detected forest-lines (i.e., transition point from continuous forest into treeline ecotones) using Theil–Sen’s nonparametric regression. Across 74 detected treeline ecotones, 27.5% of Landsat pixels displayed a significant positive trend in EVI and 5.6% of pixels displayed a significant negative trend ( p < 0.05). By using ALS data to determine vegetation structural class, we found that non-treed pixels had the highest percentage of significant positive trends in vegetation greenness (40.8%), followed by shrubs (30.5%), with lower percentages in sparse forests (18.9%) and open/dense forests (13.3%). These results suggest herbaceous and shrub vegetation types are undergoing the most significant changes in greenness, likely due to increases in shrub cover and herbaceous biomass in areas associated with these alpine treeline ecotones. The limited increases in EVI in forests likely indicates that vegetation cover is changing less rapidly in forests than in shrub and herbaceous vegetation types. Moreover, EVI may not be capturing increased height growth in forests near the treeline. Combining ALS data and Landsat time-series data provides a useful approach to locate and characterize alpine treeline ecotones, and enables the direct assessment of which vegetation structural classes are experiencing the greatest greening trends, thereby providing new insights to ecosystem change.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.365
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations46
Published2018
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnvironmental Research LettersSame topicRemote Sensing and LiDAR ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207