Los sermones de Bernat de Déu, OFM en el contexto de la predicación antijudía medievaL
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Some sermons and articles of the Summa praedicabilium by Bernat de Deu, OFM (active in the first quarter of 14th century) refer to the Jews. Given the scarcity of Hispanic sermons from the early fourteenth century, the analysis ofthese sermons in the context of the most recent studies on the subject can fill the void in research pertaining to Medieval Hispanic preaching. Among the sources used by Bernat de Deu there are works already well-known by then such as theDialogues against the Jews of Pedro Alfonso or long standing narrative examples, but there are also fragments from the Extractiones de Talmud (written for the trial of the Talmud of 1240 in Paris) or several works of Ramon Marti, publishedat the time. Regarding both the tone and sources, Bernat de Deu appears as an important preacher for understanding the evolution of preaching in the early fourteenth century, his role in the formation of hatred against the Jews, and his relationship to the religious polemic of the day.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".