MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2883070356

Montréal Ed. 18

2017· book· en· W2883070356 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Collectif Ulysse

Bibliographic record

VenueUlysse (Guides de voyage) eBooks · 2017
Typebook
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFrench Urban and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le Guide Ulysse Montreal est l'outil indispensable pour vivre Montreal intensement, gouter et participer a la creativite qui l'anime, et faire les meilleures trouvailles! Laissez-vous inspirer par les choix de ses auteurs pour explorer la ville en connaisseur et vivre le Montreal authentique. Muni du guide Ulysse Montreal, faites une pause nature dans l'un des splendides parcs de la ville et profitez de multiples suggestions d'activites a pratiquer en toute saison. Tres complet avec sa vingtaine de circuits de visite a travers les plus vibrants quartiers de la ville, ses nombreuses suggestions de sorties et d'activites, et sa cartographie precise et detaillee, il plaira autant aux visiteurs qu'aux Montrealais soucieux de connaitre les secrets les mieux gardes de la metropole quebecoise.Tous les charmants quartiers et splendides attraits de la ville sont couverts, depuis les rues etroites chargees d'histoire du Vieux-Montreal jusqu'aux ruelles fleuries du Plateau Mont-Royal. La section « A moi Montreal! » recense les sites incontournables a voir en fonction de vos interets ou du temps dont vous disposez, tandis que les capsules « Envie de... ? » proposent des arrets agreables a faire, du cafe convivial a la librairie de quartier. Les bonnes adresses fourmillent dans le guide Ulysse Montreal, dans lequel on trouve plus de 800 suggestions de bonnes tables, de lieux de sorties, de belles boutiques et d'etablissements hoteliers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.086
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUlysse (Guides de voyage) eBooksSame topicFrench Urban and Social StudiesFrench-language works237,207