Les messagers de l’invisible chez les Inuits de l’Arctique de l’Est canadien
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les rapports que les Inuits entretiennent avec lesqupirruit(les petites bestioles) et les savoirs qu’ils possèdent à leur égard demeurent méconnus. Dans les rares études disponibles, l’accent a surtout été placé sur les peurs et la terreur que suscitent ces petites bêtes auprès des humains. On a également souligné leur rôle dans l’initiation chamanique, ces êtres étant en contact avec la mort et susceptibles de revivre ou de se métamorphoser. À partir de sources orales anciennes et contemporaines, cet article aborde un tout autre aspect des petites bestioles, en particulier leur rôle de messagers. Lesqupirruitsont des entités capables de guider les humains dans leurs gestes et leurs prises de décision, de les accompagner et de les protéger, d’annoncer des événements à venir. Alors que les traditions chamaniques ont basculé dans l’invisible, il convient de se demander si les petites bestioles ne sont pas aujourd’hui perçues plus positivement que jadis, nonobstant leur ambivalence.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".