Understanding Fundamental Properties and Atmospheric Features of Subdwarfs via a Case Study of SDSS J125637.13–022452.4<sup>∗</sup>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract We present the distance-calibrated spectral energy distribution (SED) of the sdL3.5 subdwarf SDSS J125637.13−022452.4 (J1256−0224) using its Gaia DR2 parallax. We report the bolometric luminosity and semi-empirical fundamental parameters, as well as updated UVW velocities. The SED of J1256−0224 is compared to field-age and low-gravity dwarfs of the same effective temperature ( T eff ) and bolometric luminosity. In the former comparison, we find that the SED of J1256−0224 is brighter than the field source in the optical, but dims in comparison beyond the J band, where it becomes fainter than the field from the H through W2 bands. Compared to the young source, it is fainter at all wavelengths. We conclude that J1256−0224 is depleted of condensates compared to both objects. A near-infrared band-by-band analysis of the spectral features of J1256−0224 is done and is compared to the equivalent T eff sample. From this analysis, we find a peculiar behavior of the J -band K i doublets whereby the 1.17 μ m doublet is stronger than the field or young source, as expected, while the 1.25 μ m doublet shows indications of low gravity. In examining a sample of four other subdwarfs with comparable data, we confirm this trend across different subtypes indicating that the 1.25 μ m doublet is a poor indicator of gravity for low-metallicity objects. In the K -band analysis of J1256−0224, we detect the 2.29 μ m CO line of J1256−0224, previously unseen in the low-resolution SpeX data. We also present fundamental parameters using Gaia parallaxes for nine additional subdwarfs with spectral types M7–L7 for comparison. The 10 subdwarfs are placed in a temperature sequence, and we find a poor linear correlation with spectral type. We present polynomial relations for absolute magnitude in JHKW1W2, effective temperature, and bolometric luminosity versus spectral type for subdwarfs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".