MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2883211058 · doi:10.1073/pnas.1607817115

Evolutionary repurposing of a sulfatase: A new Michaelis complex leads to efficient transition state charge offset

2018· article· en· W2883211058 on OpenAlexaff
C.M. Miton, Stefanie Jonas, Gerhard W. Fischer, Fernanda Duarte, Mark F. Mohamed, Bert van Loo, Bálint Kintses, Shina Caroline Lynn Kamerlin, Nobuhiko Tokuriki, Marko Hyvönen, Florian Hollfelder

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEnzyme Catalysis and Immobilization
Canadian institutionsCanada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences CentreUniversity of British Columbia
FundersBiotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
KeywordsActive siteMolecular dynamicsChemistryBiophysicsBiologyComputational biologyEnzymeBiochemistryComputational chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Significance The versatility of promiscuous enzymes plays a key role in the evolution of catalysts. This work addresses the molecular mechanism of repurposing a promiscuous enzyme by laboratory evolution and reveals that mutations distinct from the catalytic machinery reshaped the active site. Evolution fine-tuned binding of a previously disfavored Michaelis complex (E·S), repositioning the promiscuous substrate to enable better charge offset during leaving group departure in the transition state. The functional transition relies on maintaining the reactivity of existing catalytic groups in a permissive active-site architecture, able to accommodate multiple substrate binding modes, without requiring changes in conformational dynamics. Such a parsimonious route to higher efficiency illustrates a molecular scenario in which catalytic promiscuity facilitates short adaptive pathways of evolution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.210

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations45
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the National Academy of SciencesSame topicEnzyme Catalysis and ImmobilizationFrench-language works237,207