Angular Upsampling in Infant Diffusion MRI Using Neighborhood Matching in x-q Space
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Diffusion MRI requires sufficient coverage of the diffusion wavevector space, also known as the q-space, to adequately capture the pattern of water diffusion in various directions and scales. As a result, the acquisition time can be prohibitive for individuals who are unable to stay still in the scanner for an extensive period of time, such as infants. To address this problem, in this paper we harness non-local self-similar information in the x-q space of diffusion MRI data for q-space upsampling. Specifically, we first perform neighborhood matching to establish the relationships of signals in x-q space. The signal relationships are then used to regularize an ill-posed inverse problem related to the estimation of high angular resolution diffusion MRI data from its low-resolution counterpart. Our framework allows information from curved white matter structures to be used for effective regularization of the otherwise ill-posed problem. Extensive evaluations using synthetic and infant diffusion MRI data demonstrate the effectiveness of our method. Compared with the widely adopted interpolation methods using spherical radial basis functions and spherical harmonics, our method is able to produce high-resolution diffusion MRI data with greater quality, both qualitatively and quantitatively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".