MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2883269103 · doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1887

OH 18 cm observations of the intermediate-velocity molecular cloud G211+63

2018· article· en· W2883269103 on OpenAlexaff
Allison J. Smith, Loris Magnani, Louis González, Timothy Robishaw

Bibliographic record

VenueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Canadian institutionsHerzberg Institute of AstrophysicsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsMolecular cloudAstrophysicsExtinction (optical mineralogy)Line (geometry)Virial theoremTrace gasAtomic physicsAtmospheric sciencesGalaxyStarsOpticsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We detected OH 18 cm main line emission from 5 of 7 positions in the intermediate-velocity molecular cloud (IVMC) G211+63. These are the first detections of hydroxyl in IVMCs. Our OH detections at AV levels ranging from 0.24 to 0.27 mag reinforce the notion that these lines can efficiently trace diffuse, low-extinction molecular gas. N(OH) is derived for a range of excitation temperatures (5–30 K) and likely falls between 1 and 16 × 10|$^{13}\, {\rm cm}^{-2}$|⁠. The corresponding N(H2) values are consistent both with estimates derived from E(B − V) and CO data. Estimates of the cloud mass from the OH data range from 26 to 820 M⊙ for distances from 100 to 400 pc and Tex from 5 to 10 K. These values are 3–20 times less than the virial mass of the cloud. It is likely IVMCs resemble high-latitude clouds in this respect. If so, they are transient structures breaking up on time-scales of |${\sim }10^6\, {\rm yr}$|⁠.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society→Same topicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies→French-language works237,207→