Rheological characterization of long-chain branched poly(lactide) prepared by reactive extrusion in the presence of allylic and acrylic coagents
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Reactive extrusion of poly(lactide) (PLA) is implemented to introduce branching, through grafting of multifunctional coagents in the presence of free-radicals. Two types of coagents, allylic and acrylate-based, are compared by analyzing the melt-state linear viscoelastic properties, in combination with triple detection size-exclusion chromatography. The coagent-modified PLA compounds exhibit substantially higher zero shear viscosity, pronounced shear thinning, and higher activation energies for flow when compared to the neat linear PLA. The accompanying increases in the molar mass, broadening of the dispersity, and appearance of high molar mass tails are attributed to the presence of branched architectures. The pronounced deviations from the linear Mark–Houwink plot suggest that long-chain branched structures are generated through the combination of the trifunctional coagents with the PLA macroradicals. The allylic coagent, triallyl mesate (TAM) is substantially more effective in introducing branched structures at low concentrations. On the other hand, the highly reactive acrylate-based coagents are prone to oligomerization in the presence of peroxide resulting in a separate phase, leading to reduced branch density compared to TAM.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it