La regulación de los consorcios, con especial consideración de los consorcios locales
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El artículo analiza pormenorizadamente la evolución histórica del régimen jurídico de los consorcios, tanto con anterioridad a la entrada en vigor de la Ley 27/2013, de 27 de diciembre, de racionalización y sostenibilidad de la Administración Local, como después de esta, examinando tanto las innovaciones incorporadas por la Ley 15/2014, de 16 de septiembre, de racionalización del Sector Público y otras medidas de reforma administrativa, como el régimen actualmente vigente en la Ley 40/2015, de 1 de octubre, de Régimen Jurídico del Sector Público. El artículo se detiene en el régimen de los consorcios de la Administración local, analizando en particular la inconstitucionalidad sobrevenida a consecuencia del efecto de aquellas nuevas leyes estatales, normas básicas, sobre las leyes de las comunidades autónomas que configuraban los consorcios como entidades locales. Culmina el autor con un análisis crítico del régimen actual, tanto de sus aciertos, en particular la fijación de un régimen unitario, como de sus insuficiencias y dificultades, en particular en lo que al modo de adscripción a un sector público se refiere.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.043 | 0.056 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.017 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.010 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".