Transcriptomic Evidence for Alterations in Astrocytes and Parvalbumin Interneurons in Subjects With Bipolar Disorder and Schizophrenia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: High-throughput expression analyses of postmortem brain tissue have been widely used to study bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. However, despite the extensive efforts, no consensus has emerged as to the functional interpretation of the findings. We hypothesized that incorporating information on cell type-specific expression would provide new insights. METHODS: We reanalyzed 15 publicly available bulk tissue expression datasets on schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, representing various brain regions from eight different cohorts of subjects (unique subjects: 332 control, 129 bipolar disorder, 341 schizophrenia). We studied changes in the expression profiles of cell type marker genes and evaluated whether these expression profiles could serve as surrogates for relative abundance of their corresponding cells. RESULTS: In both bipolar disorder and schizophrenia, we consistently observed an increase in the expression profiles of cortical astrocytes and a decrease in the expression profiles of fast-spiking parvalbumin interneurons. No changes in astrocyte expression profiles were observed in subcortical regions. Furthermore, we found that many of the genes previously identified as differentially expressed in schizophrenia are highly correlated with the expression profiles of astrocytes or fast-spiking parvalbumin interneurons. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate convergence of transcriptome studies of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder on changes in cortical astrocytes and fast-spiking parvalbumin interneurons, providing a unified interpretation of numerous studies. We suggest that these changes can be attributed to alterations in the relative abundance of the cells and are important for understanding the pathophysiology of the disorders.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".