MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2883372792

Third-Quarter GDP

2007· article· en· W2883372792 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Brent Meyer

Bibliographic record

VenueEconomic Trends · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEconomic Growth and Productivity
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)Investment (military)Gross domestic productEconomicsConsumption (sociology)Real gross domestic productGross private domestic investmentAgricultural economicsMonetary economicsProduction (economics)Return on investmentEconomic growthGeographyMacroeconomics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Real gross domestic product (GDP) increased at a 3.9 percent annualized rate in the third quarter of 2007, following a growth rate of 3.8 percent in the second quarter. Growth in personal consumption expenditures (PCE) accelerated in the third quarter, from 1.4 percent in the second quarter to 3.0 percent in the third. Also contributing to the rise in real GDP was an increase in exports, from 7.5 percent to 16.2 percent, driven by a 23.0 percent spike in goods exports. Imports rose from –2.7 percent to 5.2 percent. Gross private fixed investment was somewhat weaker in the third quarter, rising only 0.8 percent, as residential investment fell 20.1 percent and the growth rate in business fixed investment dropped from 11.0 percent in the second quarter to 7.9 percent in the third. However, investment in equipment and software rose 5.9 percent during the quarter, to its highest growth rate in six quarters. Of course, this information is from the advance report, which is based on incomplete data and, in some cases, trend assumptions, and is subject to further revisions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.633
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEconomic TrendsSame topicEconomic Growth and ProductivityFrench-language works237,207