MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2883383695 · doi:10.1055/s-0038-1644967

Natural Health Product Regulations: Past, Present and Future

2018· article· en· W2883383695 on OpenAlexaffabout
H Boon

Bibliographic record

VenuePlanta Medica International Open · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicComplementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPresentation (obstetrics)ReputationNatural (archaeology)Product (mathematics)Perspective (graphical)BusinessHealth carePublic relationsMarketingMedicinePolitical scienceComputer scienceLawHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Canada has an international reputation for having some of the most progressive regulations for natural health products; however, they are not without controversy. Dr. Boon will share her perspective regarding the development of the current regulations. Her presentation will review her research on the perceptions and impact of the regulations as well as summarizing what is known about how consumers make decisions about natural health products. She will offer insights based on her experiences talking about the regulations with consumers, health care professionals and the media. She will conclude the presentation with her thoughts on the future of Canada's regulation of natural health products.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.721
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.389
Teacher spread0.343 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlanta Medica International OpenSame topicComplementary and Alternative Medicine StudiesFrench-language works237,207