Evolutionary cell biology traces the rise of the exomer complex in Fungi from an ancient eukaryotic component
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cargo is transported from the trans-Golgi Network to the plasma membrane by adaptor complexes, which are pan-eukaryotic components. However, in yeast, cargo can also be exported by the exomer complex, a heterotetrameric protein complex consisting of two copies of Chs5, and any two members of four paralogous proteins (ChAPs). To understand the larger relevance of exomer, its phylogenetic distribution and function outside of yeast need to be explored. We find that the four ChAP proteins are derived from gene duplications after the divergence of Yarrowia from the remaining Saccharomycotina, with BC8 paralogues (Bch2 and Chs6) being more diverged relative to the BB8 paralogues (Bch1 and Bud7), suggesting neofunctionalization. Outside Ascomycota, a single preduplicate ChAP is present in nearly all Fungi and in diverse eukaryotes, but has been repeatedly lost. Chs5, however, is a fungal specific feature, appearing coincidentally with the loss of AP-4. In contrast, the ChAP protein is a wide-spread, yet uncharacterized, membrane-trafficking component, adding one more piece to the increasingly complex machinery deduced as being present in our ancient eukaryotic ancestor.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".